<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (6) TMI 13 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7722</link>
    <description>A loan or advance by a closely held company to a shareholder may fall within the extended dividend definition in section 2(6A)(e) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 because it is treated as dividend out of accumulated profits. However, for the corporation tax rebate under the Finance Act, 1956, the statutory expression was &quot;distributed to its shareholders&quot;, and the court treated &quot;distribution&quot; and &quot;payment&quot; as distinct. The deemed-dividend fiction in the Income-tax Act was not extended beyond the language used in the Finance Act, so the loan was not dividend distributed to shareholders for rebate withdrawal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (6) TMI 13 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7722</link>
      <description>A loan or advance by a closely held company to a shareholder may fall within the extended dividend definition in section 2(6A)(e) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 because it is treated as dividend out of accumulated profits. However, for the corporation tax rebate under the Finance Act, 1956, the statutory expression was &quot;distributed to its shareholders&quot;, and the court treated &quot;distribution&quot; and &quot;payment&quot; as distinct. The deemed-dividend fiction in the Income-tax Act was not extended beyond the language used in the Finance Act, so the loan was not dividend distributed to shareholders for rebate withdrawal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>