<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 258 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342520</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of the appellant-assessee, a public sector undertaking, in a case involving the jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act regarding a Corporate Social Responsibility claim. The Court held that the Commissioner&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was unwarranted as the Assessing Officer had adequately considered and allowed the claim, despite it not being explicitly mentioned in the assessment order. The Court emphasized the sufficiency of the appellant&#039;s response and overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ultimately quashing the orders of both the Commissioner and the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 258 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342520</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of the appellant-assessee, a public sector undertaking, in a case involving the jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act regarding a Corporate Social Responsibility claim. The Court held that the Commissioner&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was unwarranted as the Assessing Officer had adequately considered and allowed the claim, despite it not being explicitly mentioned in the assessment order. The Court emphasized the sufficiency of the appellant&#039;s response and overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ultimately quashing the orders of both the Commissioner and the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>