<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 254 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342516</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the revenue, overturning the decisions of lower authorities, due to the assessee&#039;s failure to justify the claimed consultancy charges expenditure. The court emphasized the importance of proving claimed expenditures and the admissibility of retracted statements in assessments. The CIT (A) and ITAT&#039;s acceptance of the assessee&#039;s surrender at Rs. 50 lakhs without justification for the remaining amount was deemed incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 May 2017 07:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 254 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342516</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the revenue, overturning the decisions of lower authorities, due to the assessee&#039;s failure to justify the claimed consultancy charges expenditure. The court emphasized the importance of proving claimed expenditures and the admissibility of retracted statements in assessments. The CIT (A) and ITAT&#039;s acceptance of the assessee&#039;s surrender at Rs. 50 lakhs without justification for the remaining amount was deemed incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>