<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (3) TMI 23 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7719</link>
    <description>Section 23A applies only where the statutory conditions for treating a company as one in which the public were substantially interested are not met. Mere family relationship among shareholders does not by itself prove that they were acting in concert; the revenue must show concerted action or other material demonstrating that the public interest requirement is not satisfied. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that such proof was lacking was treated as a factual conclusion based on the evidence, and no perversity or legal error was shown. The tribunal also acted lawfully in proceeding on the material before it without taking further evidence, so section 23A was held inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (3) TMI 23 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7719</link>
      <description>Section 23A applies only where the statutory conditions for treating a company as one in which the public were substantially interested are not met. Mere family relationship among shareholders does not by itself prove that they were acting in concert; the revenue must show concerted action or other material demonstrating that the public interest requirement is not satisfied. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that such proof was lacking was treated as a factual conclusion based on the evidence, and no perversity or legal error was shown. The tribunal also acted lawfully in proceeding on the material before it without taking further evidence, so section 23A was held inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>