https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191970 Parity in pensionary treatment was recognised for High Court Judges elevated from the Bar, because the Court found that source of appointment could not justify discriminatory post-retiral benefits for holders of the same constitutional office. It held that ten years' practice at the Bar must be counted as qualifying service for pensionary purposes, with the relief directed to operate from 01.04.2004 and the relevant rules to be amended accordingly. On post-retiral facilities, the Court noted the need for suitable support such as domestic help, telephone, driver, and secretarial assistance, and left existing allowances in place while expecting States to frame appropriate schemes on the adopted model. en-us Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 May 2017 07:27:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191970 Parity in pensionary treatment was recognised for High Court Judges elevated from the Bar, because the Court found that source of appointment could not justify discriminatory post-retiral benefits for holders of the same constitutional office. It held that ten years' practice at the Bar must be counted as qualifying service for pensionary purposes, with the relief directed to operate from 01.04.2004 and the relevant rules to be amended accordingly. On post-retiral facilities, the Court noted the need for suitable support such as domestic help, telephone, driver, and secretarial assistance, and left existing allowances in place while expecting States to frame appropriate schemes on the adopted model. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191970