<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1302 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191972</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing proper benchmarking in Transfer Pricing adjustments, adherence to judicial precedents in calculating guarantee fees, and the correct classification of SAP implementation expenses as revenue expenditure. The issue of TDS and TCS credit was remitted for verification. The judgment reinforced the importance of detailed analysis and adherence to legal principles in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 May 2017 07:27:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1302 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191972</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing proper benchmarking in Transfer Pricing adjustments, adherence to judicial precedents in calculating guarantee fees, and the correct classification of SAP implementation expenses as revenue expenditure. The issue of TDS and TCS credit was remitted for verification. The judgment reinforced the importance of detailed analysis and adherence to legal principles in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>