https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342505 In an NDPS bail context, the absence of a quantitative forensic report was treated as a serious defect because the prosecution had shown only qualitative testing, with some samples described as mixed substances. Without proof of purity or exact narcotic content, the material could not be reliably classified as small quantity or commercial quantity. The court also noted that standing instructions required both qualitative and quantitative testing, with results produced along with the charge sheet. Non-compliance with that procedure created a material lacuna in the prosecution case, and the petitioner was therefore held entitled to bail. en-us Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 May 2017 07:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342505 In an NDPS bail context, the absence of a quantitative forensic report was treated as a serious defect because the prosecution had shown only qualitative testing, with some samples described as mixed substances. Without proof of purity or exact narcotic content, the material could not be reliably classified as small quantity or commercial quantity. The court also noted that standing instructions required both qualitative and quantitative testing, with results produced along with the charge sheet. Non-compliance with that procedure created a material lacuna in the prosecution case, and the petitioner was therefore held entitled to bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342505