<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1238 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191961</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the AO for reconsideration of the disallowed deduction for outstanding leave salary expenses, based on the retrospective application of the second proviso to section 43B. The addition for unexplained loans and interest was upheld for creditors lacking evidence. Disallowances for outstanding salary, telephone expenses, interest on loans, belated PF payments, and differences in receipts were adjusted based on evidence and legal precedents. The deletion of an ad-hoc addition for office expenses was upheld, and the disallowance for vehicle expenses was reduced. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, and the Departmental appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 16:31:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1238 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191961</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the AO for reconsideration of the disallowed deduction for outstanding leave salary expenses, based on the retrospective application of the second proviso to section 43B. The addition for unexplained loans and interest was upheld for creditors lacking evidence. Disallowances for outstanding salary, telephone expenses, interest on loans, belated PF payments, and differences in receipts were adjusted based on evidence and legal precedents. The deletion of an ad-hoc addition for office expenses was upheld, and the disallowance for vehicle expenses was reduced. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, and the Departmental appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>