<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 703 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191958</link>
    <description>In NDPS bail proceedings, the Court treated the stringent statutory bail restrictions as significant but still found that unusual custody circumstances and the communication sent to authorities supported release. The alleged non-compliance with the mandatory search procedure was also considered a relevant factor at the bail stage, because strict adherence to the search requirements could materially affect the bail assessment. Bail was granted to both appellants on conditions, and the trial was directed to proceed expeditiously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 11:40:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 703 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191958</link>
      <description>In NDPS bail proceedings, the Court treated the stringent statutory bail restrictions as significant but still found that unusual custody circumstances and the communication sent to authorities supported release. The alleged non-compliance with the mandatory search procedure was also considered a relevant factor at the bail stage, because strict adherence to the search requirements could materially affect the bail assessment. Bail was granted to both appellants on conditions, and the trial was directed to proceed expeditiously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>