<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (6) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7714</link>
    <description>A proportionate disallowance of managing agency commission was not justified where the remuneration was payable as a percentage of the company&#039;s net annual profits and related to the business as an integrated whole. The agricultural operations were treated as part of a composite commercial undertaking with the sugar business, so the expenditure was incurred for general management of the entire business rather than for a separable exempt activity. On that basis, business expenditure allowable under the taxing provision was not to be split merely because part of the profits arose from exempt agricultural income. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (6) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7714</link>
      <description>A proportionate disallowance of managing agency commission was not justified where the remuneration was payable as a percentage of the company&#039;s net annual profits and related to the business as an integrated whole. The agricultural operations were treated as part of a composite commercial undertaking with the sugar business, so the expenditure was incurred for general management of the entire business rather than for a separable exempt activity. On that basis, business expenditure allowable under the taxing provision was not to be split merely because part of the profits arose from exempt agricultural income. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>