<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1119 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191951</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act and to restrict disallowance under Section 14A to 1% of the dividend income. The Tribunal affirmed that loans given for consideration beneficial to the company do not qualify as deemed dividends and supported the reasonable approach taken in limiting disallowance under Section 14A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 10:47:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1119 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191951</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act and to restrict disallowance under Section 14A to 1% of the dividend income. The Tribunal affirmed that loans given for consideration beneficial to the company do not qualify as deemed dividends and supported the reasonable approach taken in limiting disallowance under Section 14A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>