<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1283 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191953</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the need to consider case-specific factors for estimating net profit. It directed to adopt 10% net profit on direct works contracts and 6% on sub contract works due to the firm&#039;s large turnover and lack of verifiable documentation. The decision highlighted the importance of assessing income accurately based on the specific circumstances of each case, rather than relying solely on general precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 10:47:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1283 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191953</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the need to consider case-specific factors for estimating net profit. It directed to adopt 10% net profit on direct works contracts and 6% on sub contract works due to the firm&#039;s large turnover and lack of verifiable documentation. The decision highlighted the importance of assessing income accurately based on the specific circumstances of each case, rather than relying solely on general precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>