<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 240 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342502</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting individual co-owners the benefit of Service Tax exemption under Notification No.6/2005-ST. It held that co-owners were not an association of persons, eligible for separate exemptions based on their proportionate shares of rent. The decision emphasized Service Tax should be based on services provided by each co-owner, not collectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 240 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342502</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting individual co-owners the benefit of Service Tax exemption under Notification No.6/2005-ST. It held that co-owners were not an association of persons, eligible for separate exemptions based on their proportionate shares of rent. The decision emphasized Service Tax should be based on services provided by each co-owner, not collectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>