<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 239 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342501</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invoked Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, and waived penalties imposed on the appellant, a service provider, for non-payment of service tax. The appellant demonstrated no mala fide intent, having paid the tax and interest, and not passing the tax burden to clients. Citing precedents, the Tribunal emphasized discretion in penalty imposition under Sections 76, 77, and 78. The appellant&#039;s ignorance of tax liability and good faith efforts to comply led to penalty waiver. The Hon&#039;ble Karnataka High Court decisions supported this stance, resulting in the appeal&#039;s disposal with upheld tax payment and waived penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 239 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342501</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invoked Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, and waived penalties imposed on the appellant, a service provider, for non-payment of service tax. The appellant demonstrated no mala fide intent, having paid the tax and interest, and not passing the tax burden to clients. Citing precedents, the Tribunal emphasized discretion in penalty imposition under Sections 76, 77, and 78. The appellant&#039;s ignorance of tax liability and good faith efforts to comply led to penalty waiver. The Hon&#039;ble Karnataka High Court decisions supported this stance, resulting in the appeal&#039;s disposal with upheld tax payment and waived penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>