https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342494 The appeals filed by M/s Baba Vishwakarma Engineering Co. (P) Ltd. & Shri Anupam Kamboj were allowed as the Tribunal found that the issue regarding contravention of Rule 8 (3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was already settled in a previous case. The Tribunal held that payment through Cenvat credit was a valid mode of payment, not limited to payment through Account Current, as established in a prior ruling. Consequently, the demand under Rule 8 (3A) for the relevant period was set aside, and the impugned order was overturned. en-us Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 May 2017 11:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342494 The appeals filed by M/s Baba Vishwakarma Engineering Co. (P) Ltd. & Shri Anupam Kamboj were allowed as the Tribunal found that the issue regarding contravention of Rule 8 (3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was already settled in a previous case. The Tribunal held that payment through Cenvat credit was a valid mode of payment, not limited to payment through Account Current, as established in a prior ruling. Consequently, the demand under Rule 8 (3A) for the relevant period was set aside, and the impugned order was overturned. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342494