https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342487 Bail was discussed in an NDPS prosecution where Section 37 restrictions were treated as inapplicable because the alleged offences were not punishable under Sections 19, 24 or 27A. The material indicated that the information said to have been received by customs was not reduced into writing, and the complaint papers did not show compliance with Section 42 of the NDPS Act. The laboratory report showed Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride, but no quantitative analysis was carried out, contrary to the standing instruction relied on in the case. Investigation was complete, the complaint had been filed, and the co-accused had already been enlarged on bail, supporting release on bail. en-us Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 May 2017 10:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342487 Bail was discussed in an NDPS prosecution where Section 37 restrictions were treated as inapplicable because the alleged offences were not punishable under Sections 19, 24 or 27A. The material indicated that the information said to have been received by customs was not reduced into writing, and the complaint papers did not show compliance with Section 42 of the NDPS Act. The laboratory report showed Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride, but no quantitative analysis was carried out, contrary to the standing instruction relied on in the case. Investigation was complete, the complaint had been filed, and the co-accused had already been enlarged on bail, supporting release on bail. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342487