<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 210 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342472</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing reassessment of expenditure disallowance due to a temporary lull in business activity. The appellant&#039;s argument regarding the temporary setback was acknowledged, leading to a remittance of the issue for reevaluation by the Assessing Officer. This decision grants the appellant an opportunity to provide further evidence and arguments concerning the expenditure disallowance in light of the temporary business decline and subsequent recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 07:38:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 210 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342472</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing reassessment of expenditure disallowance due to a temporary lull in business activity. The appellant&#039;s argument regarding the temporary setback was acknowledged, leading to a remittance of the issue for reevaluation by the Assessing Officer. This decision grants the appellant an opportunity to provide further evidence and arguments concerning the expenditure disallowance in light of the temporary business decline and subsequent recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>