<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 209 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342471</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D as the assessee did not earn any exempt income during the year. The Tribunal also dismissed the ground related to the disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) as not pressed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 07:37:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 209 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342471</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D as the assessee did not earn any exempt income during the year. The Tribunal also dismissed the ground related to the disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) as not pressed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>