<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 203 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342465</link>
    <description>The Appeals involved challenges to the addition of alleged bogus purchases and the disallowance of Service Tax Liability under Section 43B for Assessment Years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The Tribunal reduced the additions on alleged bogus purchases from 20% to 12.5% for both years, citing lack of concrete proof. Regarding the Service Tax Liability, the Tribunal directed verification of the outstanding amount to determine if it was payable under service tax rules, potentially leading to deletion of the addition. Ultimately, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed in the decision pronounced on 02nd May 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 07:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 203 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342465</link>
      <description>The Appeals involved challenges to the addition of alleged bogus purchases and the disallowance of Service Tax Liability under Section 43B for Assessment Years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The Tribunal reduced the additions on alleged bogus purchases from 20% to 12.5% for both years, citing lack of concrete proof. Regarding the Service Tax Liability, the Tribunal directed verification of the outstanding amount to determine if it was payable under service tax rules, potentially leading to deletion of the addition. Ultimately, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed in the decision pronounced on 02nd May 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>