<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (12) TMI 14 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7705</link>
    <description>A lump-sum compromise payment made after repudiation of a service contract was treated as compensation for loss of employment, not as taxable salary or profit in lieu of salary. The payment was made in settlement of a wrongful-dismissal claim and in return for the employee abandoning all contractual rights, so the earlier service arrangement and its terminal-payment clause did not govern the compromise. The inclusion of a salary claim in the suit did not change the character of the receipt. The amount was therefore characterised as a capital receipt arising from termination of employment and excluded from assessment as salary income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (12) TMI 14 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7705</link>
      <description>A lump-sum compromise payment made after repudiation of a service contract was treated as compensation for loss of employment, not as taxable salary or profit in lieu of salary. The payment was made in settlement of a wrongful-dismissal claim and in return for the employee abandoning all contractual rights, so the earlier service arrangement and its terminal-payment clause did not govern the compromise. The inclusion of a salary claim in the suit did not change the character of the receipt. The amount was therefore characterised as a capital receipt arising from termination of employment and excluded from assessment as salary income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>