<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (12) TMI 58 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191940</link>
    <description>The court held that the Central Government lacks the authority to revoke an exemption granted under section 89(4) of the Companies Act, 1956, after the one-year period specified in section 89(1) has elapsed. The challenged order rescinding the exemption was deemed invalid, and the respondents were restrained from enforcing it. The petition was granted, and the respondents were directed to cover the petitioner company&#039;s costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 18:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (12) TMI 58 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191940</link>
      <description>The court held that the Central Government lacks the authority to revoke an exemption granted under section 89(4) of the Companies Act, 1956, after the one-year period specified in section 89(1) has elapsed. The challenged order rescinding the exemption was deemed invalid, and the respondents were restrained from enforcing it. The petition was granted, and the respondents were directed to cover the petitioner company&#039;s costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>