<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 191 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342453</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled in a case involving a dispute between the Revenue and M/s Agrawal Constructions regarding alleged non-payment of tax for various services. The Tribunal confirmed tax liability in some categories, while dropping demands in others. It found that certain demands for mining services were unsustainable due to limitations in the show cause notice. The Tribunal scrutinized work orders and applicable tax laws to assess each demand&#039;s sustainability. Ultimately, the Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, providing a detailed analysis of each demand to reach a just decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 191 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342453</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled in a case involving a dispute between the Revenue and M/s Agrawal Constructions regarding alleged non-payment of tax for various services. The Tribunal confirmed tax liability in some categories, while dropping demands in others. It found that certain demands for mining services were unsustainable due to limitations in the show cause notice. The Tribunal scrutinized work orders and applicable tax laws to assess each demand&#039;s sustainability. Ultimately, the Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, providing a detailed analysis of each demand to reach a just decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>