https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191939 A separate agreement said to cancel or qualify the sale was held unproved because the sale deed showed full payment, the alleged document had inconsistencies, no attesting witness was examined, and expert evidence was not treated as conclusive. On foreign-exchange restrictions, a breach of the prohibition on non-citizens acquiring immovable property was held not to make the purchase void or stop title from passing, since the statute provided penal consequences rather than nullity. Subsequent events, including a Reserve Bank certificate, could be considered in appeal for moulding relief, and the additional evidence was taken on record. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 May 2017 10:21:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191939 A separate agreement said to cancel or qualify the sale was held unproved because the sale deed showed full payment, the alleged document had inconsistencies, no attesting witness was examined, and expert evidence was not treated as conclusive. On foreign-exchange restrictions, a breach of the prohibition on non-citizens acquiring immovable property was held not to make the purchase void or stop title from passing, since the statute provided penal consequences rather than nullity. Subsequent events, including a Reserve Bank certificate, could be considered in appeal for moulding relief, and the additional evidence was taken on record. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 06 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191939