https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7703 Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure was held applicable to a suit under Schedule 2, Rule 43 of the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act because the term "suit" was treated as wide enough to include proceedings seeking declaratory or injunctive relief. The court rejected the argument that the suit was the notice requirement merely because it was linked to revenue proceedings, and applied the settled view that statutory notice under Section 80 admits of no judicial exception. As notice had not been served, the suit was held incompetent, the decree below was set aside, and the suit was dismissed. en-us Thu, 04 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7703 Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure was held applicable to a suit under Schedule 2, Rule 43 of the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act because the term "suit" was treated as wide enough to include proceedings seeking declaratory or injunctive relief. The court rejected the argument that the suit was the notice requirement merely because it was linked to revenue proceedings, and applied the settled view that statutory notice under Section 80 admits of no judicial exception. As notice had not been served, the suit was held incompetent, the decree below was set aside, and the suit was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 04 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7703