https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342438 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the main appellant, reducing confirmed duty demands to cum duty price and decreasing penalties to 25% of the recalculated duty. Penalties on directors were also reduced to a nominal amount due to lack of evidence implicating them in clandestine activities. The judgment emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence to establish duty liabilities and penalties, ensuring fairness in the adjudication process. en-us Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 May 2017 07:39:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342438 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the main appellant, reducing confirmed duty demands to cum duty price and decreasing penalties to 25% of the recalculated duty. Penalties on directors were also reduced to a nominal amount due to lack of evidence implicating them in clandestine activities. The judgment emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence to establish duty liabilities and penalties, ensuring fairness in the adjudication process. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342438