<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 172 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342434</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the ITAT&#039;s decision and reinstated the additions made by the AO regarding undisclosed income of Rs. 1.25 crores by the assessee. The court emphasized the importance of timely and justified retractions in tax matters, concluding that the ITAT erred in deleting the additions without sufficient justification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 172 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342434</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the ITAT&#039;s decision and reinstated the additions made by the AO regarding undisclosed income of Rs. 1.25 crores by the assessee. The court emphasized the importance of timely and justified retractions in tax matters, concluding that the ITAT erred in deleting the additions without sufficient justification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>