<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 167 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the set-off of brought forward business losses against Short Term Capital Gains under Section 72 of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the allowance of expenses of professional fees, ROC, Audit fees, and Tax Audit fees against income from other sources. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the decisions of the CIT(A) were upheld in both aspects of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 07:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 167 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the set-off of brought forward business losses against Short Term Capital Gains under Section 72 of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the allowance of expenses of professional fees, ROC, Audit fees, and Tax Audit fees against income from other sources. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the decisions of the CIT(A) were upheld in both aspects of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>