<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 164 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342426</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on all three issues, directing the AO to delete the disallowances and additions made. The judgment provided detailed reasoning based on the nature of the expenses and legal precedents, ensuring a fair assessment of the disputed amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 07:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 164 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342426</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on all three issues, directing the AO to delete the disallowances and additions made. The judgment provided detailed reasoning based on the nature of the expenses and legal precedents, ensuring a fair assessment of the disputed amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>