<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 160 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342422</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) as the addition was based on the deeming provisions of Section 50C and not on any actual concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income by the assessee. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2017 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 160 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342422</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) as the addition was based on the deeming provisions of Section 50C and not on any actual concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income by the assessee. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>