<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 672 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191931</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC held that the capital subsidy received by the assessee cannot be adjusted for determining the cost of acquisition of building and machinery for tax purposes, following the precedent set by the SC in CIT v. P.J. Chemicals Ltd. (1994).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 18:10:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 672 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191931</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC held that the capital subsidy received by the assessee cannot be adjusted for determining the cost of acquisition of building and machinery for tax purposes, following the precedent set by the SC in CIT v. P.J. Chemicals Ltd. (1994).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>