<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 151 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Hindustan Zinc Ltd., holding that the denial of credit of Service Tax on technical inspection and certification services related to pipelines supplying water to Dariba Mines was incorrect. The Tribunal emphasized that the services were essential for the manufacturing process, and the pipelines were exclusively used for water transport. Citing a previous decision and the broad definition of &#039;input service,&#039; the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to claim Cenvat Credit for the service tax paid on the input service used in the manufacturing process. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 151 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Hindustan Zinc Ltd., holding that the denial of credit of Service Tax on technical inspection and certification services related to pipelines supplying water to Dariba Mines was incorrect. The Tribunal emphasized that the services were essential for the manufacturing process, and the pipelines were exclusively used for water transport. Citing a previous decision and the broad definition of &#039;input service,&#039; the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to claim Cenvat Credit for the service tax paid on the input service used in the manufacturing process. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>