https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191918 A Mauzadar in the Assam Valley was treated as holding a civil post under the State because the office involved appointment and removal by the State, administrative supervision, remuneration from State funds, and the discharge of continuing public duties attached to the office. The Court applied the test of whether the post had the incidents of State employment and found that delegated revenue and allied governmental functions, maintenance of official records, and control by the Deputy Commissioner supported civil-post status. The absence of a fixed salary and the part-time character of the office did not negate that conclusion. The Mauzadar was therefore held entitled to protection under Article 311(2). en-us Mon, 03 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 May 2017 10:37:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191918 A Mauzadar in the Assam Valley was treated as holding a civil post under the State because the office involved appointment and removal by the State, administrative supervision, remuneration from State funds, and the discharge of continuing public duties attached to the office. The Court applied the test of whether the post had the incidents of State employment and found that delegated revenue and allied governmental functions, maintenance of official records, and control by the Deputy Commissioner supported civil-post status. The absence of a fixed salary and the part-time character of the office did not negate that conclusion. The Mauzadar was therefore held entitled to protection under Article 311(2). Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191918