<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 139 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant to claim CENVAT credit for outdoor catering services but dismissed the appeal regarding guest house maintenance services. The appellant&#039;s argument that all services related to their business activities should be considered input services was partially accepted based on precedents from the High Court of Karnataka. The judgment was delivered on March 23, 2017, by the Tribunal in Bangalore.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 139 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant to claim CENVAT credit for outdoor catering services but dismissed the appeal regarding guest house maintenance services. The appellant&#039;s argument that all services related to their business activities should be considered input services was partially accepted based on precedents from the High Court of Karnataka. The judgment was delivered on March 23, 2017, by the Tribunal in Bangalore.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>