<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 138 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to lack of evidence supporting clandestine removal of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 138 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to lack of evidence supporting clandestine removal of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>