<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 125 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342387</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding the validity of a notice issued under section 147 read with section 148. The court found the notice to be without jurisdiction due to inadequacy of reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer. Emphasizing the necessity of valid reasons for reopening a case, the court highlighted that the belief of income escapement must be reasonable and based on relevant material reasons. The court set aside the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, stating that the Tribunal erred in assessing the sufficiency of reasons, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 125 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342387</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding the validity of a notice issued under section 147 read with section 148. The court found the notice to be without jurisdiction due to inadequacy of reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer. Emphasizing the necessity of valid reasons for reopening a case, the court highlighted that the belief of income escapement must be reasonable and based on relevant material reasons. The court set aside the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, stating that the Tribunal erred in assessing the sufficiency of reasons, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>