<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 113 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342375</link>
    <description>The tribunal found that the delay in filing the appeal by the assessee was condoned due to significant jurisdictional issues raised. The tribunal also held that the initiation of proceedings under Section 153C was invalid as the satisfaction was not recorded by the correct authority. Consequently, all assessment orders were quashed, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 113 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342375</link>
      <description>The tribunal found that the delay in filing the appeal by the assessee was condoned due to significant jurisdictional issues raised. The tribunal also held that the initiation of proceedings under Section 153C was invalid as the satisfaction was not recorded by the correct authority. Consequently, all assessment orders were quashed, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>