<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1189 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191917</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, allowed the appeal of a manufacturer regarding the denial of CENVAT credit on various input services. The Tribunal granted credit on several services, including air freight charges, export-related charges, chartered engineer services, courier charges, mobile charges, training, telephone charges, and travel expenses. These services were considered essential for the appellant&#039;s business and met the definition of input services under Section 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules. The Tribunal overturned the lower authorities&#039; decision, allowing the appeal and granting CENVAT credit on the disputed services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 07:35:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1189 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191917</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, allowed the appeal of a manufacturer regarding the denial of CENVAT credit on various input services. The Tribunal granted credit on several services, including air freight charges, export-related charges, chartered engineer services, courier charges, mobile charges, training, telephone charges, and travel expenses. These services were considered essential for the appellant&#039;s business and met the definition of input services under Section 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules. The Tribunal overturned the lower authorities&#039; decision, allowing the appeal and granting CENVAT credit on the disputed services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>