https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342366 The court found that the order was passed prematurely, violating natural justice principles, as the petitioner was not given the opportunity to submit relevant documents within the granted time. The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the matter back to the first respondent for a fresh decision after granting the petitioner a final opportunity for a personal hearing. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to natural justice principles, directed a fresh hearing, and instructed the first respondent to issue a new order within four weeks, without expressing any view on the merits of the petitioner's claim. en-us Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342366 The court found that the order was passed prematurely, violating natural justice principles, as the petitioner was not given the opportunity to submit relevant documents within the granted time. The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the matter back to the first respondent for a fresh decision after granting the petitioner a final opportunity for a personal hearing. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to natural justice principles, directed a fresh hearing, and instructed the first respondent to issue a new order within four weeks, without expressing any view on the merits of the petitioner's claim. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342366