<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 101 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342363</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, dismissing the service tax liability on the reimbursed amount received from clients towards media cost. It overturned the denial of Cenvat credit due to improper documentation, emphasizing compliance with legal provisions and precedents in its decision-making. The Tribunal found no merit in confirming the service tax liability against the appellant, referencing previous decisions and a specific Board Circular. It deemed the denial of credit unjustified based on precedents and the appellant&#039;s successful challenge on a similar issue for a later period, ultimately allowing the appeals of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 101 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342363</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, dismissing the service tax liability on the reimbursed amount received from clients towards media cost. It overturned the denial of Cenvat credit due to improper documentation, emphasizing compliance with legal provisions and precedents in its decision-making. The Tribunal found no merit in confirming the service tax liability against the appellant, referencing previous decisions and a specific Board Circular. It deemed the denial of credit unjustified based on precedents and the appellant&#039;s successful challenge on a similar issue for a later period, ultimately allowing the appeals of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>