https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342360 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an Order-in-Original demanding service tax, interest, and penalty. It held that the petitioner's failure to approach the Settlement Commission before the order of adjudication was served precluded them from raising legal issues related to Section 32E of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court emphasized the distinction between rights available before and after adjudication, affirming that the Settlement Commission loses jurisdiction post-adjudication. The petitioner was advised to file a statutory appeal against the Order-in-Original with leniency for any delays. en-us Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Sep 2018 15:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342360 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an Order-in-Original demanding service tax, interest, and penalty. It held that the petitioner's failure to approach the Settlement Commission before the order of adjudication was served precluded them from raising legal issues related to Section 32E of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court emphasized the distinction between rights available before and after adjudication, affirming that the Settlement Commission loses jurisdiction post-adjudication. The petitioner was advised to file a statutory appeal against the Order-in-Original with leniency for any delays. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342360