<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 96 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342358</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (A) for a decision on merits without insisting on pre-deposit. The Tribunal found that most input services had been recognized as valid in previous decisions and in the appellant&#039;s case. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was remanded for a reasoned decision in accordance with the law. The order was pronounced in Open Court on 31/03/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 12:09:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 96 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342358</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (A) for a decision on merits without insisting on pre-deposit. The Tribunal found that most input services had been recognized as valid in previous decisions and in the appellant&#039;s case. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was remanded for a reasoned decision in accordance with the law. The order was pronounced in Open Court on 31/03/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>