https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342350 The Tribunal upheld the duty demand due to clandestine removal of goods, noting discrepancies in duty computation and penalty imposition. The matter was remanded for a detailed review to consider benefits like CVD and SAD, allowing the appellants to present their case. The impugned order alleging duty evasion and misuse of NEPZ facilities was upheld, but a fresh review of duty calculation was ordered for a fair assessment. Evidence showed clandestine removal of diamond jewellery without duty payment, leading to a reevaluation of duty computation to rectify deficiencies and provide a fair opportunity for the appellants to present their case. en-us Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 May 2017 12:09:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342350 The Tribunal upheld the duty demand due to clandestine removal of goods, noting discrepancies in duty computation and penalty imposition. The matter was remanded for a detailed review to consider benefits like CVD and SAD, allowing the appellants to present their case. The impugned order alleging duty evasion and misuse of NEPZ facilities was upheld, but a fresh review of duty calculation was ordered for a fair assessment. Evidence showed clandestine removal of diamond jewellery without duty payment, leading to a reevaluation of duty computation to rectify deficiencies and provide a fair opportunity for the appellants to present their case. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342350