<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 86 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342348</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalty in an appeal challenging the rejection of the appellant&#039;s appeal by the Commissioner (A) and confirmation of the Order-in-Original. The appellant&#039;s genuine belief in duty-free clearances to EPCG license holders, supported by disclosures in returns, led the Tribunal to find the demand time-barred due to lack of suppression of facts. Emphasizing the Department&#039;s duty to scrutinize returns and the Revenue&#039;s burden to prove intention to evade duty, the Tribunal concluded the impugned order was unsustainable, dismissing the interest and penalty as well.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 12:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 86 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342348</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalty in an appeal challenging the rejection of the appellant&#039;s appeal by the Commissioner (A) and confirmation of the Order-in-Original. The appellant&#039;s genuine belief in duty-free clearances to EPCG license holders, supported by disclosures in returns, led the Tribunal to find the demand time-barred due to lack of suppression of facts. Emphasizing the Department&#039;s duty to scrutinize returns and the Revenue&#039;s burden to prove intention to evade duty, the Tribunal concluded the impugned order was unsustainable, dismissing the interest and penalty as well.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>