<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 71 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342333</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the taxation of short term capital gains for the Assessment Year 2006-07 based on an unregistered development agreement. It determined that a transfer of property had occurred as both parties had acted upon the agreement, requiring the builder to construct and deliver the apartment to the assessee. The appeals challenging the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) orders were dismissed, affirming the taxation of capital gains for the subject year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 09:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 71 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342333</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the taxation of short term capital gains for the Assessment Year 2006-07 based on an unregistered development agreement. It determined that a transfer of property had occurred as both parties had acted upon the agreement, requiring the builder to construct and deliver the apartment to the assessee. The appeals challenging the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) orders were dismissed, affirming the taxation of capital gains for the subject year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>