<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 65 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342327</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the loan obtained on interest did not qualify as &#039;deemed dividend&#039; under Sec. 2(22)(e) of the IT Act. The judgment emphasized that loans given and repaid with interest, benefiting the company, should not be treated as &#039;deemed dividends&#039;. The Assessee&#039;s arguments, supported by legal precedents, led to the deletion of the amount treated as deemed dividend under the provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 09:30:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 65 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342327</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the loan obtained on interest did not qualify as &#039;deemed dividend&#039; under Sec. 2(22)(e) of the IT Act. The judgment emphasized that loans given and repaid with interest, benefiting the company, should not be treated as &#039;deemed dividends&#039;. The Assessee&#039;s arguments, supported by legal precedents, led to the deletion of the amount treated as deemed dividend under the provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>