<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 64 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342326</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning additions related to unexplained deposits from father and wife, and low withdrawals. The Tribunal remanded the issue of treating agricultural income as other income back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal considered the reasonable cause for the delay in providing confirmation letters for deposits and investments, leading to the allowance of the appeal on those grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 09:30:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 64 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342326</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning additions related to unexplained deposits from father and wife, and low withdrawals. The Tribunal remanded the issue of treating agricultural income as other income back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal considered the reasonable cause for the delay in providing confirmation letters for deposits and investments, leading to the allowance of the appeal on those grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>