<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 687 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191890</link>
    <description>The dispute between the Commissioner and a government corporation was placed before the Committee on Disputes, which concluded that it was not a fit case for filing appeals. Acting on that determination, the Supreme Court declined to interfere and dismissed the civil appeals. The operative point is that the appeals could not be pursued after the Committee on Disputes decided against further litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 11:49:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 687 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191890</link>
      <description>The dispute between the Commissioner and a government corporation was placed before the Committee on Disputes, which concluded that it was not a fit case for filing appeals. Acting on that determination, the Supreme Court declined to interfere and dismissed the civil appeals. The operative point is that the appeals could not be pursued after the Committee on Disputes decided against further litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>