<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 55 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342317</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the rejection of the refund claim was unjustified as the limitation under Section 11B does not apply to amounts paid under mistake. It was established that the tax burden was not passed on to the educational institutions, thus rejecting the unjust enrichment argument. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs, if any.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 08:58:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 55 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342317</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the rejection of the refund claim was unjustified as the limitation under Section 11B does not apply to amounts paid under mistake. It was established that the tax burden was not passed on to the educational institutions, thus rejecting the unjust enrichment argument. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs, if any.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>