<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 54 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342316</link>
    <description>The appeals were successful as the denial of refund for specific input services related to export of Information Technology Software Services by an Export Oriented Unit was deemed unjustified. The presiding member concluded that the input services were essential for providing output services, leading to the rejection of refund claims being set aside and the appeals allowed with possible consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 08:58:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 54 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342316</link>
      <description>The appeals were successful as the denial of refund for specific input services related to export of Information Technology Software Services by an Export Oriented Unit was deemed unjustified. The presiding member concluded that the input services were essential for providing output services, leading to the rejection of refund claims being set aside and the appeals allowed with possible consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>