<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 48 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342310</link>
    <description>Unrecorded excess stock of readymade garments found in a factory, when not reflected in statutory records and not supported by a credible explanation, may be treated as liable to confiscation as goods intended for clandestine clearance; the confiscation was upheld, though the redemption fine was reduced. A shortage of finished garments, which should have been entered in RG-1 and removed on invoices, justified duty demand and penalty because the goods were treated as unaccounted finished stock; the duty liability and penalty were sustained, subject to reduction of penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 08:57:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 48 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342310</link>
      <description>Unrecorded excess stock of readymade garments found in a factory, when not reflected in statutory records and not supported by a credible explanation, may be treated as liable to confiscation as goods intended for clandestine clearance; the confiscation was upheld, though the redemption fine was reduced. A shortage of finished garments, which should have been entered in RG-1 and removed on invoices, justified duty demand and penalty because the goods were treated as unaccounted finished stock; the duty liability and penalty were sustained, subject to reduction of penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>